Mushroom Growing.Aotearoa New ZealandSearch

Was Sporeshift Mushrooms NZ Caught Selling Illegal Mushroom Spawn?

A Sporeshift invoice and a Trade Me screenshot document blue-oyster spawn offered under the name Pleurotus ostreatus. MPI separately confirmed that misidentified blue-oyster cultures circulated through unnamed retailers. Do the records establish that these were the same spawn?

Claim examined

Sporeshift sold blue-oyster spawn on Trade Me, and MPI later identified that spawn as an unapproved, undescribed Pleurotus lineage.

Answer from the available evidence: The records establish that Sporeshift invoiced a product described as “Blue Oyster Spawn” and that a Trade Me listing advertised blue oyster as P. ostreatus. MPI established that spawn bought from an unnamed online retailer was actually Pleurotus sp. OB. The public MPI report, invoice and screenshots do not contain a shared transaction, batch, sample or case identifier. They therefore do not establish that MPI tested the particular spawn sold by Sporeshift.

Sporeshift’s New Zealand mushroom practice

Sporeshift Mushrooms NZ is a North Canterbury business founded by Taylor McConnell with Susan Jacobs. It began as a gourmet mushroom farm supplying restaurants, markets and shops and expanded into grow kits, grain spawn, agar cultures, cultivation supplies and education.

The business says it produces spawn, undertakes culture work and supports home growers and other small farms. Its public educational work covers indoor kits, outdoor logs, garden beds and larger-scale grain-spawn cultivation. Read Sporeshift’s description of its activities.

The 2019 fundraiser

A Givealittle campaign sought funding for new mushroom cultures for New Zealand. The page discussed purchasing a culture, shipping, legal fees and laboratory testing for identification in New Zealand. It shows that the organiser recognised that importation and identification could involve formal costs.

The campaign does not establish that the proposed import occurred, that any culture entered New Zealand, or that a later blue-oyster product came from the culture pictured on the page.

The spawn photograph

Bag of grain represented as blue-oyster spawn supplied by Sporeshift
Bag represented as blue-oyster grain spawn supplied by Sporeshift. A handwritten label and visible mycelium do not establish species identity, purity, import history or regulatory status.

The photograph shows a partly colonised bag of grain with handwriting on the plastic. It may document the condition of a product at a particular time, but colonisation percentage, shipping cost and appearance cannot answer the taxonomic or legal question.

The Sporeshift invoice

Redacted Sporeshift Mushrooms invoice for one kilogram of Blue Oyster Spawn
Redacted Sporeshift Mushrooms NZ Ltd invoice for one kilogram of “Blue Oyster Spawn,” dated November 2019. It establishes the commercial description used in that transaction.

The invoice identifies Sporeshift as seller and records one kilogram of “Blue Oyster Spawn,” plus freight. It is relevant primary evidence that Sporeshift sold a product under that common name.

The customer, invoice number and other details are redacted. The invoice does not provide a scientific culture identifier, batch, MPI case number, test result or retained voucher. It cannot by itself establish that the product was Pleurotus sp. OB or that its sale breached a law.

The Trade Me listing

Trade Me mushroom-spawn listing showing Blue Oyster as Pleurotus ostreatus
Trade Me listing screenshot offering “Blue Oyster – Pleurotus Ostreatus” among several spawn options. The visible crop does not show the seller or listing date.

The listing is evidence that a seller used the scientific name P. ostreatus for a blue-oyster option. In the cropped image, the seller identity and date are not visible. Even with a seller identified, the listing would establish the advertised name rather than the organism’s laboratory identity.

What MPI’s 2020 investigation established

MPI reported that an incursion investigator acquired spawn advertised online as P. ostreatus from an unnamed retailer. The Plant Health and Environment Laboratory identified it as an undescribed lineage then called Pleurotus sp. OB, which was distinct from the true P. ostreatus material used in an earlier EPA determination.

MPI also investigated four cultures imported by another unnamed retailer. Testing found two hybrids and two cultures assigned to the OB lineage. Back-tracing found related stock at ten unnamed retailers, and available cultures were recalled.

Identification limit: MPI’s public report does not name Sporeshift, Taylor McConnell, Trade Me, the importer or any retailer. “Investigation positive” records a biosecurity investigation outcome; it is not a conviction or a finding that a named business knowingly offended.

Read MPI Surveillance 47(2), pages 29–30.

Can the transaction and MPI sample be connected?

EvidenceWhat it establishesMissing link
Sporeshift invoiceA sale described as one kilogram of “Blue Oyster Spawn”No culture code, batch, case number or test result
Trade Me screenshotA listing described blue oyster as P. ostreatusSeller and date are not visible in the crop
Spawn photographThe appearance of a bag represented as the supplied spawnNo sealed sample or laboratory chain of custody
MPI reportAn unnamed retailer’s spawn was identified as Pleurotus sp. OBNo public retailer, transaction or sample identifier

A direct connection would require records such as an unredacted transaction supplied under proper authority, sealed packaging, matching identifiers, MPI evidence-receipt documentation or an official statement naming the supplier. Those records have not been located for this article.

Independent research involving Sporeshift

A University of Canterbury thesis records three commercial samples attributed to Sporeshift and collected in February 2022. They were identified as P. djamor (PDD 124113), P. parsonsiae (PDD 124109) and P. pulmonarius (PDD 124111).

These records independently document those three later samples. They do not identify the 2019 blue-oyster product and should not be used either to prove or disprove the identity of that earlier spawn. View the University of Canterbury thesis record.

Was the spawn “illegal”?

The common name “blue oyster” is not a legal classification. True P. ostreatus was determined by EPA in 2019 to have been present in New Zealand before the HSNO Act cut-off date. MPI later explained that some commercial cultures sold under that name fall elsewhere within the broader P. ostreatus species complex and do not match true P. ostreatus.

A culture’s status depends on its actual identity, whether it is a new organism, its import pathway and any approvals or clearance applying to it. An undescribed lineage may require regulatory attention, but the word “undescribed” does not alone establish a criminal offence by a seller.

MPI said the biological risk of the OB lineage was initially unclear, then used an existing P. ostreatus assessment to conclude that it would not pose a biosecurity risk. The report therefore does not support predictions that this culture would devastate native forests or endanger consumers.

MPI’s report supports saying that misidentified, previously unrecorded cultures entered a New Zealand supply chain and were recalled. It does not support saying, without the missing supplier link, that Sporeshift was officially caught or found guilty of selling an illegal organism.

What the evidence supports

References